Surprised? It sure doesn't sound like MLB will get behind the new deal as currently constituted; could the District and Baseball be heading to arbitration after all? (Meanwhile, the Williams camp continues to view the world through rose-colored glasses...)
"It clearly contains conditions, restrictions and new provisions which go well beyond our previous agreements and raises a number of questions...We want to make sure that the kind of ballpark we agreed upon will be built." (Bob Dupuy, via Washington Post 2/11/2006)
"We want to make sure that the kind of ballpark we agreed upon will be built, that it can be paid for as we have agreed, that the team be able to exercise adequate control over the ballpark site, that we understand the limits of the legislative power to further rewrite contracts we enter into and that the balance of burdens and benefits agreed to by us in mediation is readdressed, since it has been seriously disrupted by the legislation." (Bob DuPuy, via mlb.com 2/10/2006)
"It's a good sign. It shows MLB is just as keen to press ahead with the ballpark as we are...So far as we can tell, the late-night revisions made by the council do not jeopardize the deal and mostly reaffirm our existing plans." (Williams' spokesman Vince Morris, via AP 2/10/2006)
(Baltimore Sun photo by Kenneth K. Lam)



