« Shairon Martis should probably start looking for an apartment in DC/MD/VA | Main | Apparently, there was no handshake agreement to save Wily Mo. »

March 26, 2009

Comments

Which is not to say that I'm not still ticked off.

If Bowden's superiors did not know about the handshake deal at the time it was made (or at least up until the point of Bowden's "resignation", wouldn't they let whomever told them about it now know that they don't believe them?

If the only parties to the handshake deal were Bowden and Young, then Rizzo, Kasten, and the Lerners can tell anyone seeking enforcement of it that they are "just making this up." Even if Bowden were to vouch for the deal after the fact, such assurance would have no effect.

It seems to me that the club is honoring the handshake because they sanctioned it at the time it was made or soon thereafter.

If not, how much would I have to pay Bowden to vouch that he and I had a handshake deal made on December 12, 2008 that the Nats would pay me $300,000 on April 6, 2009?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Search the Natosphere

-------------