(When Ted Lerner laughs, the world laughs with him. Well, not Scott Boras. That's an AP Photo.)
Remember last Friday night when we suggested that Ted Lerner was probably, at that very moment, wearing a tux, sipping a scotch, and smiling, all the while nodding knowingly in the wake of news of a sham of a top-secret meeting between the Rangers and Prince Fielder/Boras at the same hotel where Joel Hanrahan was getting married? (Coincidence? Nice one, Scott!)
And so, Yu Darvish and the Rangers agreed on a 6 year, $60 million deal (add in the $51 million posting fee, and it's a paltry $111 Million commitment). And Ted Lerner didn't blink; no, he's probably laughing right now. Even billionaires laugh sometimes, folks! Now that Scott Boras's Last Stand has gone up in smoke (that is: wait out the Yu Darvish negotiations and hope Lerner budges on his last, best offer), the Nationals are ready to tell the world (read: Boras) that they're working on a contract extension for Ryan Zimmerman (as reported by MLB.com's Bill Ladson). This report was promptly shot down in a Tweet by the Washington Post's Adam Kilgore shortly thereafter.
In other words: we're "guessing" (surprise! air quotes!) Ted Lerner will now tell Boras he waited too long and made a bad business gesture by running to Nolan Ryan (this guess brought to you by a person who knows stuff and is usually right). That last best offer -- maybe not exactly on the table anymore? This is not to say that the Nats are no longer interested in Prince Fielder - oh, they are - but we're guessing (no air quotes) Scott Boras now needs to come back to the table with hat in hand and make good with Mr. Lerner. Payback's a bitch, Scott.
Nats are being pumped back up as the front runners for Fielder, as they should be - we're hearing Nats, Rangers, Blue Jays, Marlins all still in play. Of course, for good measure isn't it CBSSports.com's Jon Heyman who still insists on including Seattle and the Orioles in the mix? We're still picking the Nats...albeit in a deal that's a little more palatable for Mr. Lerner. Unless Boras and the Marlins...




Mark Lerner is your source, isn't he?
Posted by: Anonymoose | January 18, 2012 at 10:06 PM
Could this mean 5 years or an out clause?
Posted by: Homer | January 18, 2012 at 10:30 PM
@Anonymoose: Actually, I AM Mark Lerner.
(Mark, if you're reading this: relax, I'm not really you)
Posted by: The Nats Enquirer | January 18, 2012 at 10:37 PM
@Homer: Your guess as good as ours. Unless we put our guess in quotes, which means it's most likely a better guess than yours. :)
Let the record show that until we see PF putting a Curly W lid on his head up on the dais at Nats Park, we remain very, very, freaked out about the Marlins. Because what the Marlins always do is beat the bleep out of the Nats.
Posted by: The Nats Enquirer | January 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM
Boras is just becoming too predictable. Now he has to try to convince Lerner that his regional arch-rival Angelos wants Prince.
Sounds familiar? MARK TEIXEIRA
By the way, great writing. I like how you transition to all parts of the story with humor too. You have really become the Nats fans site for the good dirt on Prince!
Posted by: Michael L.G. | January 18, 2012 at 10:46 PM
"one will fall to us"
I like the idea of Fielder in Baltimore more than Washington. By the time the Orioles get competitive, he'll be old. Actually we might all be old by that time!
Fielder on a short contract isn't unappealing though.
I'm just glad the Nats haven't been desperate so far, I hope it continues.
Posted by: WFY | January 19, 2012 at 09:28 AM
We all know the Nats have offered 5 years and are comfortable with that. Is there any scenario they can be pushed beyond 5 years that makes sense? Those opt-outs are a gamble. What if Fielder is eating Ben's hot dogs and balloons to 305 on the Toledo® scale?
Posted by: NatsLink | January 19, 2012 at 10:41 AM
@NatsLink I think the scenario for anything beyond a 5 year deal is the Nats moving to the AL or the NL adopting the designated hitter.
Posted by: Homer | January 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM